X/Twitter Colludes With Anti-Defamation League to Censor
Hope Wins: Before And After Intravenous EDTA Chelation + Vitamin C - Dark Field Live Blood Analysis - A Case Report
Hope Wins: Before And After Intravenous EDTA Chelation + Vitamin C - Dark Field Live Blood Analysis - A Case Report
below…
408,270 views Jun 14, 2018
Dr. Charles Morgan speaks to cadets and faculty at West Point about a range of topics, including psychology, neurobiology, and the science of humans at war. Dr. Morgan's neurobiological and forensic research has established him as an international expert in post-traumatic stress disorder, eyewitness memory, and human performance under conditions of high stress. The event was organized and hosted by the Modern War Institute at West Point.
What is most alarming is the delicate way that the presenter dances around the obvious, or rather one aspect of the obvious. He talks about how these technologies (like all technology) can be used to compensate for deficits or else expand the horizon of the possible. He talks about how they can be used to augment military and intelligence activities. And he talks about the way that they can be seen as strategic "threats" when developed by a foreign nation's "state actors". He delves a bit into the dangers of ambitious "non-state actors" and uses a typical example of a militaristic cult (probably working as a covert asset on the behalf of state actors, actually). But he never considers directly the ominous and rather obvious possibility of an overlap of these aspects of the ramifications of these developments in technology, namely that state actors, in collusion with "non-state" assets, can work to become a technologically advanced threat to their own host populations. What a thought.
Have victims of covid “vaccines” become a new source of organ donors?
Jacinda Ardern’s government had an emotional response to the crisis and a mistaken understanding of science, which led to multiple vaccine-induced deaths. Have these victims become a new source of organ donors for organ transplantation?
By perusing scientific literature from around the world, New Zealand’s Dr. Guy Hatchard explores what vaccine-induced deaths mean from the perspective of transplant surgeons.
“[While] transplant surgeons are very excited to have more available young donors … [they] completely fail to comment on the significance of the increased number of cases of vaccine-induced death,” he writes. “Transplant surgeons are narrowly focused on their discipline. Despite being aware of increases in covid vaccine-induced death, they wrote papers which failed to sound the alarm.”
This leads Dr. Hatchard into a discussion of the harms vaccines cause and the efforts of Ardern and MP (Midazolam Pusher) Matt Hancock to ensure information about those harms are never publicly discussed or investigated.
It requires a deep dive into published scientific literature to assess why scientific opinion about covid vaccines is still polarised, despite the growing evidence of serious harm. Bear with me while we enquire how this happened with reference to an exemplar condition – stroke.
The leaked Wellington Region health data shows that the incidence of strokes requiring hospitalisation in 2023 was up by 25% on pre-pandemic levels. These rises in stroke incidence began in 2021, before the arrival of covid in New Zealand, but after the vaccine rollout began. Despite this, published scientific papers continue to point to covid-19 infection as the sole source of increased stroke incidence, in some cases, as in THIS paper, not even mentioning a possible role of covid vaccination.
Accordingly, New Zealand’s Medsafe has been able to continue to maintain there have been only two incidences of vaccine-induced deaths; allowing Ardern, Chris Hipkins (the current Prime Minister of New Zealand) Ashley Bloomfield (the former Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health and New Zealand’s Director-General of Health) and others to cling to the fiction that covid vaccination is safe.
Are Young Adults Dying Following Covid Vaccination a New Source of Viable Organs?
A pre-pandemic 2016 paper found that victims of fatal strokes are generally robust sources for organ transplant donation, especially if they are younger in age. The one exception was the need for caution with livers transplanted from those dying as a result of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) whose recipients suffered poorer survival outcomes.
THIS paper published in April 2023, describes a single case of a person who suffered a stroke in October 2021 caused by covid vaccination whose organs were harvested for transplant. The paper notes in passing that:
Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcomes, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors.
In other words, young adults are dying following covid vaccination in sufficient numbers to be appreciated by transplant surgeons as a new source of viable organs. In this single case, two harvested kidneys are still functioning well for the recipients. The authors leap from the one case study to a general conclusion:
Kidney allografts transplanted from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donors can have a good overall function with favourable outcomes.
A September 2022 paper reports on kidney transplants from 16 (yes, 16) victims of covid Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (“VITT”) to 30 organ recipients in the UK. 5 of the recipients (17%) had concerning test results following surgery and 2 of them lost the graft. The authors conclude “The involvement of VITT could not be completely excluded in one of these cases.”They go on to describe these outcomes as favourable (???).
THIS paper published in August 2022 studying four successful transplants from a single deceased donor following VITT, notes:
There are increasing reports of thrombotic complications with various COVID-19 vaccines such as the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA, Moderna mRNA, AstraZeneca Oxford (serum institute), and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccines.
Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors with Vaccine-induced Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia: Definitely Feasible and Safe
THIS paper from Italy reports two cases of VITT and subsequent successful transplants, but THIS letter to the editor of the American Journal of Transplantation in July 2021 presents a far more concerning picture. Of 13 consented deceased donors likely to have died from VITT, 10 actually donated 27 organs in total. 3 of these organs subsequently failed, 2 had impaired function, and one patient died of a cardiac arrest. In total, there were seven major thrombotic or haemorrhagic postoperative complications among 6 recipients (22%) within 9 days of transplant.
The authors concluded that the potential risks of transplanting organs from donors with VITT are twofold. First, early major thrombosis or clinically significant bleeding. Second, possible transmission of pathogenic lymphocytes (anti-PF4), characteristic of blood clotting associated with strokes.
In other words, VITT deceased donors may somehow pass on aspects of their vaccine-induced fatal illness to transplant organ recipients.
THIS additional case report presents photographic evidence of a kidney from a VITT victim in preparation for transplant showing clear evidence of tissue death and bleeding in the kidney that may be associated with the vaccine-induced injury that caused a stroke that was actually concentrated in a completely different part of the physiology.
Transplant Surgeons Are Very Excited to Have More Available Young Donors
You are probably beginning to get the picture, aren’t you? Transplant surgeons are very excited to have more available young donors, they announce that the use of organs from VITT is probably viable based on some case studies with very mixed results, but completely fail to comment on the significance of the increased number of cases of vaccine-induced death. Incredibly, our government insists only two people have died as a result of covid vaccination.
Transplant surgeons are narrowly focused on their discipline. Despite being aware of increases in covid vaccine-induced death, they wrote papers which failed to sound the alarm. But it is worse than that, medical authorities, the people who collate statistics of hospitalisation and death, failed to communicate to medical personnel and specialists in disparate fields that there were many categories of vaccine-induced illness, including not only strokes but also cardiac disease, kidney disease, reproductive disease, cancer and neurological disease.
Now imagine yourself in the position of [emergency department] doctors, nurses, GPs, specialists and other medical professionals. Like the transplant surgeons, they almost certainly did see an uptick in specific conditions they were personally treating, but they were rushed off their feet as usual helping patients and were never given information about the big picture by those with access to the summary hospitalisation statistics. Instead, they were repeatedly told the novel biotech vaccines were safe and effective beyond any doubt.
Questioning Vaccine Safety, a One-Way Ticket to De-registration
Unbelievably, they were given to understand that questioning vaccine safety was disinformation and therefore a one-way ticket to de-registration, loss of employment, income, and career prospects. None but the most principled and well-informed, would have gone down that route.
There were other reasons why alarm bells never rang. Doctors are trained to look for specific conditions and offer treatment accordingly. The idea that a vaccine might lead to a general collapse in immune system function giving rise to a wide range of conditions probably never would have occurred to most busy frontline staff. They wouldn’t have connected the dots.
In 1972 I attended a conference at Kingston University in Canada at which Hans Seyle, the inventor of the modern concept of stress, spoke. Dr. Seyle explained that stress was the non-specific or general response of the physiology to any strain placed upon it. This illustrated how psychological or physical pressure or overload could evoke general deficits in health. This and other research have led to an understanding that cells network together to maintain health on multiple fronts. In fact, trillions of coordinated biochemical actions are instituted by the body every day to stave off threats to its health.
Seyle recounted that he invented the concept of stress when he noticed that sick people he treated had something in common – they all looked ill. They were suffering from multiple symptomatology with a single cause – stress.
mRNA “vaccines” breach the cell membrane in millions if not billions of cells. They effectively reprogramme and re-task cells. Each cell is a network member. Anyone familiar with network theory will realise that covid “vaccines” could degrade the network efficiency of the whole physiology and its immune response.
We are suggesting here a generalised response to covid injections that might leave the door open for multiple vulnerabilities to develop unchecked. In other words, a general mRNA vaccine syndrome characterised by a number of conventional diagnoses appearing widely distributed in the population. This is exactly apparent in the leaked Wellington Region health data – greatly elevated levels of cardiac problems, kidney disease, strokes, reproductive issues, and cancers. Individual published studies we have discussed in the Hatchard Report also include neurological conditions.
Leaked Data Supported by Some Medical Professionals
Since first releasing the leaked data a week ago, I have heard from a number of practising health professionals. Their reports include descriptions of unprecedented increases in the incidence of rare conditions that they would not normally see, including cancers.
There are also reports of test result scores that are off the chart, for example, D-dimer scores in the 20,000 to 30,000 range. D-dimer tests are designed to monitor the formation of blood clots associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. All conditions whose incidence is increasing. It is notable that the leaked Wellington Region health data reports around 4% of D-dimer test results for both men and women are registering at elevated levels.
Most health professionals and the public are still being left in the dark as far as the overall data picture is concerned. When you hear politicians like Ardern and the UK’s Matt Hancock calling for more censorship of discussion, it has to ring alarm bells. Politically controlled censorship of health data availability is entirely inappropriate and without historical precedent. The history of science shows that knowledge and understanding progress through rational debate. Often the final outcome of scientific debate might be radically different from the first theories advanced.
Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) is often termed the father of empiricism. He argued for the possibility of scientific knowledge based upon inductive reasoning and careful observation of events in nature. His ideas contributed to the emergence of the scientific method. He wrote:
“Reading maketh a full man; conference [debate] a ready man; and writing an exact man.”
Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and Hancock would do well to revise their insistence that people forsake independent investigation or comment, and rely on the government alone for information. Such an approach doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.
For More Than Three Years We Have Been Living Through a Time of Crisis
During such periods in human history, people have an emotional need to adhere to a moral stance and ensure that others also follow, but it is also the case that crises are usually accompanied by a confusion of misinformation.
In line with her crusading pandemic policies, Jacinda Ardern has been appointed to three tech-governance leadership fellowships at Harvard University. Ardern will be lecturing students and studying ways to alter content standards and platform accountability for extremist content online.
Possibly she would approve of the agenda of UK MP Matt Hancock, formerly the public face of the covid pandemic, who has supported an amendment to legislation that would prioritise censorship of statements questioning vaccine safety and make them a criminal offence.
Those two are nothing but a couple of
Both Ardern and Hancock believe that we, the public, have not learned lessons from the last two years, where, according to them, health misinformation had a devastating impact. Notably, Hancock has blocked any comments on his Twitter post – an indication of what might be in store for us all.
Government Policies Are the Real Drivers of Health Misinformation
The revelations of widespread ill health contained in the Wellington Region data leak demonstrate how the reverse is true. Government policies restricting access to health data and suppressing open debate are the real drivers of health misinformation and poor pandemic health outcomes.
As we revealed in our recent release in the Hatchard Report “NZ Government Formulated Policy Contrary to Evidence They Had on Their Own Computers. Why?” early evidence of severe covid vaccine harm in 2021 prior to the arrival of covid was ignored. A range of serious illnesses including heart attacks, myocarditis, and acute kidney injury led to greatly elevated hospitalisation rates. It is apparent that only people occupying senior positions in the health service or government like Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, who worked closely with Ardern, had access to this data, but they kept the information completely out of public view. Why?
It seems that Ardern’s all-consuming dedication to covid vaccination arose under a quasi-scientific and political umbrella that had an international dimension of interference and control. At the time, covid vaccination was presented as not just the best option, but the only way to avoid a health catastrophe. We now know that this was highly misleading. mRNA vaccination was not safe and effective, nor did it avert a health catastrophe, but Ardern continues to advise us that it was the best choice.
Vaccine Adverse Effects Officially Labelled as a Conspiracy Theory
In contrast, there were highly qualified researchers and doctors on the international stage like Mike Yeadon, formally a vice president at a Pfizer research division, Dr. Robert Malone, who did early work on mRNA technology development, and many others who were warning of potentially serious outcomes of the new vaccines, such as cancer and immune dysfunction.
However, pharmaceutical interests, science publications, governments, and medical authorities moved rapidly to cancel these voices and side-line them as attention-seeking conspiracy theorists. Here in New Zealand, vaccine adverse effects were officially labelled as a conspiracy theory. To this day, Medsafe has only admitted that two fatalities have been caused by mRNA vaccination out of hundreds of deaths reported proximate to vaccination. And not only that, unprecedented rates of excess all-cause mortality are predominantly affecting the vaccinated.
The risk of vaccine-induced death is real and by now well documented as the sequence of transplant publications and Wellington Region health data show. There is a plethora of other studies linked in previous Hatchard Report articles. I realise it is hard to come to terms with an increased risk of death and possibly easier to ignore the personal implications, but the need to halt further covid vaccination programs is surely evident.
Hoping that the problem will dissipate or go away is not a rational response
Hoping that the problem will dissipate or go away is not a rational response, nor is doubling down on vaccination. Each additional shot increases the risk. THIS study of health care workers for example found that the bivalent vaccine currently being offered in New Zealand actually increases the risk of adverse reactions.
mRNA “vaccines” were initially described as 97% effective. They are now known to reduce covid infection rates for as few as 1 in 100 recipients. Nor do they stop transmission. It now appears they are associated with multiple serious adverse effects and deaths at rates never observed with traditional vaccines.
It appears the health authorities we were told to trust exclusively were themselves inadvertently spreading misinformation, while many of those being wrongly fact-checked, accused of conspiracy, and cancelled from social media were telling the truth.
Ardern and Hancock were leading figures promoting censorship and guiding public pronouncements of safety. Do you think they deserved the authority they wielded or do you think the Bill of Rights should have taken legal precedence, allowing us freedom of medical choice and information?
About the Author
Guy Hatchard, PhD, was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). You can subscribe to his websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology.
Featured image: Death, Dignity, and the Ethics of Organ Donation in the Shadow of Execution
Dr. Mengele 2.0's NIAID Replacement Is A Psychotic MK Ultra Mask, Lockdown and DEATHVAX™ Zealot
After a long and unprecedented career of racketeering and democide, Anthony Fauci conveniently “retired” just as PSYOP-19 was finally waning. With bivalent slow kill bioweapon uptake at around 17%, Fauci’s handlers needed to shake things up.
The installed dementia pedo criminal puppet president was ordered to nominate Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo to become director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Hope Wins: Before And After Intravenous EDTA Chelation + Vitamin C - Dark Field Live Blood Analysis - A Case Report
so does this:
15 Minute City Report @8:30 Sidewalk Labs LLC’s plan for a $14b dollar city run on Google platform, on Lake Ontario in Canada:
Who Is Vivek Ramaswamy?
Written by: Chuck Baldwin
Published on: August 24, 2023
Before this guy entered the Republican presidential contest, I had never heard of him. So, I had some quick catching up to do.
My research uncovered one element of his candidacy that is incredibly spectacular—almost unheard of—for any presidential contender, regardless of political party. I’ll explain as I go along.
Vivek Ramaswamy is a 38-year-old descendent of immigrant Hindu Indian parents and—unlike Donald Trump—is a true self-made billionaire. A graduate of Harvard and Yale and a biologist, Ramaswamy made his fortune as a biotech investor and head of a drug-development company.
From his website and under the title Truth, he lists:
God is real.
There are two genders.
Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.
Reverse racism is racism.
An open border is no border.
Parents determine the education of their children.
The nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to mankind.
Capitalism lifts people up from poverty.
There are three branches of the U.S. government, not four.
The U.S. constitution is the strongest guarantor of freedoms in history.
There are seven essential categories from which I judge any political candidate:
The life issue (abortion)
The Second Amendment (gun control)
Vaccine mandates
The Warfare State: the war in Ukraine in particular
The “Woke” agenda
Energy: the “green” and “global warming” agendas in particular
Israel: support for Zionist wars, ethnic cleansing, etc.
The Life Issue
“I think abortion is murder,” he said. “Murder is regulated at the state level. I think we’ve got to keep it there.”
Ramaswamy describes himself as a strict constitutionalist and, therefore, believes that abortion is not a federal issue but a State issue, because, as he said, abortion is murder, and murder is a State issue. He also said he agreed with the overturn of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court.
He said he supports a State’s six-week abortion ban, but said he also supports exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother. This statement puts him at odds with himself. If abortion is murder, then abortion is still murder regardless of how insemination occurred. And the life of the mother argument has long been shown to be nothing but a red herring.
But he’s the only presidential contender that you’ll hear say, “Abortion is murder.” That’s a major positive. But the rest of his stance on abortion is not very different from most Republicans—albeit Ramaswamy does seem to have a better grasp of the Constitution than any I’ve heard since Ron Paul, who is in a league of his own as a congressman known nationwide as a constitutional scholar.
The Second Amendment
Ramaswamy calls for the abolishment of the ATF.
“The ATF is an agency beyond repair. I have already pledged to shut down the FBI and to rebuild a new federal law enforcement apparatus from scratch. This new apparatus can perform the function of background checks without creating a gun registry or shadow database – and I will shut down the ATF whose culture has become so toxic that it cannot merely be ‘reformed,'” Ramaswamy will say, according to a preview of the speech obtained by Fox News Digital.
Ramaswamy will also call for expanded Second Amendment rights for Americans, including making constitutional carry the “law of the land.”
“I will support a national constitutional carry law that allows Americans to carry their firearms on their person, no matter what state you live in,” he will tell the crowd.
“In America, the armed citizenry balances out the government and its military: it’s the last bastion that deters the government from unconstitutional overreach.” (Source)
“I’m an unapologetic supporter of the Second Amendment and an unapologetic supporter of the Constitution. The First Amendment is the most important. But the Second Amendment was second for another reason; it was the second most important. Because if you go to any other country in the world, from China to Iran, they promise you all the same rights, or many of the same rights that the US does, but you don’t get them. You want to know why? The thing they’re missing is the Second Amendment. Our Founding Fathers and our Founders understood that deeply.” (Source)
Every Republican claims to be pro-Second Amendment, even if they are not—like Donald Trump. On this issue, Ramaswamy’s position sounds very similar to that of Ron DeSantis. These two gentlemen are doubtless the strongest advocates of the Second Amendment in the entire GOP presidential field—albeit, since becoming governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis has done NOTHING to overturn his State’s Red Flag gun confiscation law.
Vaccine Mandates
The corrupt FDA says you don’t have the right to even *try* medicines that haven’t been through 10+ years of testing, yet the government *mandated* Covid vaccines that sailed through FDA approval in less than 1 year. You can’t believe both things at once. Countless FDA regulations and actions are hypocritical, harmful & unconstitutional. I [Ramaswamy] will rescind them accordingly, using the Supreme Court’s holding in West Virginia vs. EPA as my legal basis for doing so. For years I was coached by industry veterans not to speak out against FDA. It’s well known that if you anger FDA, they will punish you by blackballing review of your drug review applications. “FDA never forgets” is a quietly-whispered, well-known pharma industry adage. Well, they could only shut me up for so long. Now I speak freely as a citizen. (Source)
I was dead set against the Covid vaccine mandates. I still am. (Source)
Due to the stand that Democrat Robert Kennedy, Jr. takes against mandated vaccinations, Ramaswamy said he will choose Mr. Kennedy as his running mate if he is nominated. (I believe that would be a big mistake.)
Again, only Ron DeSantis is as strongly anti-vaccine mandates as Ramaswamy. And both of these gentlemen are head and shoulders above Donald Trump, who is solely responsible for the Covid vaccine mandates that plagued the world and killed millions of people during the past three years.
The Ukraine War
According to the New York Times:
He [Ramaswamy] would not spend another dollar on aid to Ukraine but would use military force to “annihilate” Mexican drug cartels.
Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy slammed Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Saturday for pushing for Ukraine’s admission into NATO, accusing the Republican lawmaker of “marching us to the brink of nuclear war.”
“@JoeBiden needs to man up to his bully-friend Zelensky & clearly state that we are dead-set opposed to Ukrainian admission to NATO,” Ramaswamy tweeted, ahead of next week’s NATO summit in Lithuania. “This should be a hard red line.”
“It’s shameful that even Republicans like @LindseyGrahamSC are now pushing for it,” he added. “Stop marching us to the brink of nuclear war.”
Ramaswamy called NATO’s further expansion “sheer lunacy” and vowed not to be “bullied” by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky if elected.
“As President I’ll refuse to be bullied by an anti-democratic comedian-turned-leader & it’s truly mystifying to me that the rest of the West is eating out of this Pied Piper’s hand every day,” he added.
Ramaswamy is doubtless at the top of the ladder in his convictions to free America from its stupid proxy war in Ukraine. Trump and DeSantis are fighting for second. Everyone else in the field is as bloodthirsty for war as Joe Biden.
The “Woke” Agenda
“Woke Inc.” was Ramaswamy’s 2021 breakout moment, filled with pithy lines about wokeness, which the entrepreneur said “means obsessing about race, gender, and sexual orientation. Maybe climate change too.”
Fast Company magazine said the book offered an insider’s perspective in explaining “why corporations that pick up social justice causes like TikTok dances are not merely tacky, but actively harmful for society.” (Source)
For Ramaswamy, being “anti-woke” is central to his political brand. Leaving his biotech company following pressures for him to “make a statement in favor of the Black Lives Matter movement,” Ramaswamy called at CPAC for “an opportunity for the conservative movement to rise to the occasion and fill that void with a vision of American national identity that runs so deep that it dilutes this woke poison to irrelevance.” He later launched his own firm intended to pressure companies to quit ESG initiatives.
On Saturday, Ramaswamy called “woke” a “cultural cancer” in America, saying that, as president, he would advocate for starting over with agencies that “have become a cancerous rot.” (Source)
Again, it is Ramaswamy and DeSantis at the head of the pack on this issue. All of the others are non-existent on the subject.
Energy
Mr. Ramaswamy accepts the established science that the burning of fossil fuels is warming the planet, but his answer is to “drill, frack, burn coal” and use more fossil fuels. That will supposedly unleash economic growth that will pay for mitigation efforts to shield everyone from climate change. (Source)
In interviews and on the stump, he’s said he would end affirmative action, which he calls a “cancer” on American life. He would close down the Education Department, limit the power of the Federal Reserve, send U.S. armed forces to the Mexican border and stop big “woke” corporations from using environmental, social and governance, or ESG considerations to measure their performance.
In an interview, Ramaswamy said he’s “not a climate denier,” but sees the world’s warming as “not entirely bad.” He says the goal of limiting carbon emissions is “flawed” and that “people should be proud to live a high-carbon lifestyle.” He said “we have a far better chance” of growing out of the problem “than trying to engineer the climate itself.”
He also sees climate activism as one of three “secular religions” that “has America in a chokehold.” He said “the climate religion has about as much to do with the climate as the Spanish Inquisition had to do with Christ, which is to say nothing at all. It is about power, dominion, control, punishment.”
More than other GOP presidential contenders, Ramaswamy targets his criticism on Wall Street sustainability policies. He’s written letters to corporations such as Chevron, criticizing the company’s support for a carbon tax and its calculation of “Scope 3” emissions — those generated when consumers use a product, such as buying gasoline to drive a car. (Source)
Again, it’s Ramaswamy and DeSantis at the head of the pack.
Israel
Everything was rolling along according to accepted GOP parameters, with Ramaswamy either tied with DeSantis or in some cases out front of DeSantis for the honor of carrying the conservative torch into the nomination race—until this issue!
Everyone who faithfully reads this column knows that when it comes to Israel, EVERY national politician (with very few exceptions), especially EVERY presidential contender, must bow the knee to Tel Aviv. Republican or Democrat, it doesn’t matter: They are all toadies for Zionist Israel, including DeSantis, Trump, Haley, Pence, Christie, et al.
In my lifetime, the only major party presidential candidate that wasn’t owned by Israel was Dr. Ron Paul. From Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan, from George H.W. Bush to Bill Clinton, from G.W. Bush to Barack Obama, from Donald Trump to Joe Biden: All of them are bought and paid for by Israel.
And EVERY presidential contender—Democrat or Republican—in the 2024 election race is bought and paid for by Israel. That is, EVERY presidential contender except Vivek Ramaswamy, it appears.
Ramaswamy said in an interview with British actor and activist Russell Brand this month that his commitment would be to US interests only.
“There’s no North Star commitment to any one country other than the United States of America,” he said when asked about aid to Israel.
Ramaswamy’s proposal to scale back aid for Israel comes as the candidate rises in the polls, making him a greater target for his Republican rivals. (Source)
Rising GOP Presidential Candidate Calls to End U.S. Military Aid to Israel as Part of Mideast Normalization
Vivek Ramaswamy says that an Abraham Accords 2.0 with the likes of Saudi Arabia, Oman and Qatar could help wean Israel off U.S. military aid by 2028, and ‘get it on its own two feet.’ (Source)
Whoa! Vivek Ramaswamy is actually saying he will end foreign aid to Israel? Yes, he apparently is.
Ramaswamy’s constitutional position on ending foreign aid to Israel puts him in rarified air. It also makes him the biggest target on planet earth, especially if he starts pulling away from the GOP pack and begins overtaking Trump as the Republican front-runner.
The Western Deep State is run by Zionists from top to bottom. I hope Vivek truly understands the danger he is in by daring to touch politics’ “third rail.”
Obviously, it is still very early, and we have much yet to learn. But at this juncture, and by my seven measuring sticks, Ramaswamy scores pretty high. Vivek’s position against sending aid to Zionist Israel is one of the most encouraging things I’ve seen in a national politician since Ron Paul sat in Congress—and it sets him apart from, well, everybody.
I sure miss Dr. Paul. Happy 88th Birthday, Ron!
Article posted with permission from Chuck Baldwin
Chlorine Dioxide ← that is all
“He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”
Canada has enacted a new law called the Online News Act that forces social media companies to compensate domestic news organizations for content shared on their platforms. To comply with the new law, Meta banned all news — both national and international news stories — from appearing in Facebook and Instagram feeds in Canada as of June 1, 2023
Google is also blocking all Canadian news from its search, news and discover products in Canada as of June 29, 2023
According to a citizen journalist, X (formerly Twitter) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are working together to censor people on the platform. The ADL has also been influencing crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe to deplatform certain users
The ADL is using artificial intelligence software to comb through podcasts and video-game streams for “extremist” keywords. This suggests ADL is surveilling the online activities of private citizens even if those activities have nothing to do with the ADL’s political and social causes
While Elon Musk has called himself a “free speech absolutist” and promised X would be a free speech platform, evidence suggests otherwise. X CEO Linda Yaccarino is the chairman of the World Economic Forum’s Taskforce on Future of Work and sits on the WEF’s Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry Governors Steering Committee. She has stated that “lawful but awful” posts will be “deamplified,” and that the company policy is one of “freedom of speech, not reach.” X is also actively recruiting applicants for various censorship positions for the upcoming election in 2024
Censorship is ramping up at a rapid clip, and much of it is clearly directed by the U.S. federal government, despite a federal judge’s order prohibiting federal agencies and officials from communicating with social media companies about content moderation.1
In recent days, several news stories have highlighted governments’ and Big Tech’s intent to increase censorship. There’s even a rumor that Google will ban independent media from its search results altogether.2 I’ve not been able to confirm this, but considering everything else going on, would anyone really be surprised if it were true?
Google, Meta Ban News in Canada
For example, Canada has enacted a new law called the Online News Act that forces social media companies to compensate domestic news organizations for content shared on their platforms. While that may not sound like censorship, it has the same effect, as social media companies are now automatically removing all news links.3
To comply with the new law, Meta banned all news — both national and international news stories — from appearing in Facebook and Instagram feeds in Canada as of June 1, 2023.4
Google is also blocking all Canadian news from its search, news and discover products in Canada as of June 29, 2023.5 In other words, if you live in Canada, you cannot get any news whatsoever unless you subscribe or go to the news source in question directly.
X/Twitter Colludes With Anti-Defamation League to Censor
In other news, X (formerly Twitter) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are working together to censor X users, according to citizen journalist Kyle Clifton (his X account is Kyle Undercover).6
In a series of five videos7 (which you can view here), ADL director of development Courtney Kravitz and the ADL community manager for Arizona, Sarah Kader, discuss a variety of tactics the ADL is using to suppress and censor online speech.
In video No. 1, Kravitz explains that outright bans are not ideal, as it forces people to seek out alternative platforms. Hence a "balance" must be struck between preventing them from "run[ning] to this dark place where they are just with like-minded people" and preventing them from "spewing hate and disinformation."
It appears the ADL prefers tactics like shadow-banning instead, where the reach of an account or post is severely limited. "Everyone should have freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach," Kravitz tells Kyle. Interestingly enough, Musk himself used that same line in the summer of 2022.8
In video No. 2, Kravitz admits the ADL has urged Elon Musk to not reverse the ban on certain users, and in video No. 3, Kader explains how the ADL is using novel artificial intelligence software to comb through podcasts and video-game streams for "extremist" keywords.
As noted by Life Site News,9 the admission that ADL is scouring the audio streams of online gamers "suggests ADL has ... interest in combing through the online activities of private citizens not involved in political and social causes ..." Is that really something the ADL should be doing?
In video No. 4, Kravitz admits the ADL has also been influencing crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe to deplatform certain users, telling them that "extremists" are using their payment processing services to "fund their evil stuff."
And, in video No. 5, Kader explains how the Arizona ADL has set up a Law Enforcement Advisory Council to identify and address online "hate." The Advisory Council is made up of "local police departments and other law enforcement agencies all around the state." Some key questions here, of course, are: What is hateful speech, and who decides what words are considered hateful?
In recent years, we’ve seen how this "anti-hate" narrative has been used to justify the removal of people providing truthful information about COVID and the COVID jabs, for example. Somehow, medical information was deemed "hateful."
X Censorship Squad Are Anything but Free-Speech Minded
While Musk has called himself a "free speech absolutist" and promised X would be a free speech platform, the people he’s hired are not freedom-loving free speech advocates. Quite the contrary.
X CEO Linda Yaccarino is the chairman of the World Economic Forum’s Taskforce on Future of Work. She’s also part of the WEF’s Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry Governors Steering Committee.
linda yaccarino
Yaccarino has publicly asserted that she has autonomy from Musk.10 A more important question is, does she have autonomy from the WEF, or is she using X to further the WEF’s agenda?
Either way, Yaccarino has stated that "lawful but awful" posts will be "deamplified," read, shadow banned and demonetized.11 And, like Musk, she has stressed that the company policy is one of "freedom of speech, not reach" to protect "brand safety" for advertisers. And, indeed, under Yaccarino’s watch, big advertisers are once again returning to the platform.
X Is Gearing Up for Election Censorship
X is also actively recruiting applicants for various censorship positions,12 including an "Elections Team Lead," which flies in the face of Musk’s statement that "Free speech is essential for a functioning democracy."13
X censorship recruiter Aaron Rodericks is also working against Musk’s stated vision by promoting Kate Starbird,14 a former Twitter employee and chief architect of the 2020 election censorship campaign in which 100% of the top "repeat misinformation spreaders" were Conservatives.15
election misinformation
As noted in Michael Shellenberger’s testimony before the House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in March 2023:16
"Kate Starbird, who runs the University of Washington disinformation lab, has for years been funded primarily by U.S. government agencies to do social media narrative analytics of political groups, or insurgency movements, of interest or concern to U.S. military intelligence or diplomatic equities.
Starbird acknowledged that the censorship focus of CISA and EIP [Election Integrity Partnership] moved from ‘foreign, inauthentic’ social media users to ‘domestic, authentic’ social media users between 2016 to 2020."
Starbird is also one of the 23 members of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Cybersecurity Advisory Committee, launched in December 1, 2021.17
European Union Tightens Censorship Nose
In related news, X has also rolled out a new feature that allows users to report posts that violate the European Union’s new law (the Digital Services Act or DSA) against expression of political dissent, pro-Russian propaganda and other "fake news."18 The new EU law took effect August 25, 2023.19
The new EU Digital Services Act will force all major online platforms to censor medical information and election information.
Other online platforms required to meet DSA requirements for content moderation or risk heavy fines include Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Snapchat, Amazon, Booking, AliExpress, Google Shopping, Zalando, Apple, Google’s app stores, Google Maps, Wikipedia, Google Search and Bing.20 As reported by Politico:21
"These large platforms will have to stop displaying ads to users based on sensitive data like religion and political opinions. AI-generated content like manipulated videos and photos, known as deepfakes, will have to be labeled.
Companies will also have to conduct yearly assessments of the risks their platforms pose on a range of issues like public health, kids’ safety and freedom of expression. They will be required to lay out their measures for how they are tackling such risks.
‘These 19 very large online platforms and search engines will have to redesign completely their systems to ensure a high level of privacy, security and safety of minors with age verification and parental control tools,’ said [EU's Internal Market Commissioner Thierry] Breton.
External firms will audit their plans. The enforcement team in the Commission will access their data and algorithms to check whether they are promoting a range of harmful content — for example, content endangering public health or during elections. Fines can go up to 6 percent of their global annual turnover and very serious cases of infringement could result in platforms facing temporary bans."
The key words there are "content endangering public health" and "elections." That tells you the EU will force all of these platforms to censor medical information and election information.
X Implementing New Identification Rules
X is also pushing us deeper into surveillance state tyranny by requiring XBlue subscribers to submit a selfie and a government-issued ID to verify their identity.22 X will store this personal information for 30 days and share it with an Israeli identification verification company called AU10TIX.
For now, non-blue users are not required to verify their identities, but I suspect it’s only a matter of time. Eventually, you’ll have to have a digital identity to use the internet at all, and every move you make online will be tracked as part of your social credit score. X is simply paving the way.
CCDH Feigns Innocence
In 2021, it became apparent that the U.S. government was basing many of its censorship decisions on information from an obscure U.K.-based group called the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). Its "Disinformation Dozen" report,23 published March 24, 2021, has without question been one of the most widely cited "justifications" for censorship over these past two years.
The problem is that this report was itself an example of gross misinformation. The CCDH claimed 12 individuals were responsible for 73% of vaccine misinformation on social media, including Facebook, yet an investigation by Facebook revealed the so-called "disinformation dozen" were responsible for just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on the platform.24
Yet, even after Facebook set the record straight, the federal government continued to cite the CCDH report as the reason for why they wanted the people listed in it censored by Big Tech.
This is the intelligence community’s version of Nancy Pelosi’s "wrap-up smear" tactic,26 which is when a politician feeds false information to the media and then uses those media reports to support their false claims.
August 3, 2023, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, launched an investigation into the CCDH’s potential role in the Biden administration’s censorship regime.
The group was ordered to hand over records to the Judiciary Committee detailing its interactions with the U.S. government and the executive branch by August 17.27 As reported by The Washington Post that day:28
"On Thursday [August 17], the CCDH responded with a full-throated defense of its research and communications with government officials, dismissing Jordan’s allegations as ‘confusion about the organization’ in a letter.
Related documents, which were exclusively viewed by The Washington Post, show that the organization has worked with government officials from both parties ...
Jordan also has released internal communications from Meta, which he has dubbed ‘the Facebook Files,’ citing the CCDH’s research. The emails ... show that the White House discussed the CCDH’s coronavirus research with Facebook executives as it pressured the company to take a tougher line against vaccine falsehoods.
Nadgey Louis-Charles, a House Judiciary spokesperson, recently told The Post that these emails expose the ‘extent to which the Biden White House used the work of the CCDH to try to censor speech.’"
Free Speech Without Reach Is Not Freedom
The CCDH’s fabrications have been used by a long list of government actors and representatives, including members of Congress, state attorneys general and even President Biden himself, all of whom publicly called for retaliatory actions to be taken against us.
As a result, we’ve been censored on social media, delisted by Google Search, and demonetized on YouTube. We’ve been deplatformed and cut off from online payment processors, our websites have been cyberattacked and, in several cases, taken down completely — and we’ve been debanked, all for the "crime" of sharing Constitutionally-protected views and published science.
At the end of the day, the so-called "problem" of misinformation and disinformation is pure nonsense. In a free society, people debate issues and bring varying viewpoints to the table. "Misinformation" is a completely fabricated problem, made up by the very people who seek to control the public discourse for their own aims.
The technocratic cabal driving this global censorship movement know they must silence dissenting viewpoints because what they intend to impose on us is so heinous, if people understand what they’re doing, they’ll never be able to achieve their goals.
So, it’s not just "democracy" that hangs in the balance. Basic freedoms, human rights and life as we know it will be taken from us, and the only way to stop it is by waking people up to reality through information sharing. The very survival of humanity now depends on our ability to maintain free speech, which is why we must keep pushing back against all forms of censorship.