The Globalist’s SECRET Message!
URGENT: Ongoing "Bloodbath" at Planet Fitness!
SECRETS OF THE UNITED NATIONS - What everyone should know!
MEGAN SMITH'S NEW FILM FEATURES DOZENS OF SUPPRESSED CANCER CURES
Exhaustive-chronic-conditions-may-result-from-stored-trauma-heres-how-to-release-it
Marxist Education in your schools.
Mar 17, 2024
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
March 17, 2024
Psssst. You. Yeah, you! Wanna know a secret?
OK, but you gotta promise not to tell anyone.
Here it is: the inbred eugenicist elitist globalist technocrats that presume to rule over humanity are speaking in subtle code. If you listen extra carefully and you think very hard about it and learn to read between the lines, you just might discover the super secret message that the They/Them/Those of the New World Order agenda have carefully embedded in their public statements.
What, you don't believe me? OK, then let's take a look at some examples and I'll help you decode these cryptic messages.
The Secret Message
Are you ready? Let's see if you can discern what these would-be controllers of humanity are really saying:
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation." —Prince Philip, Interview
"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." —Margaret Sanger, Woman and the New Race.
"Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by the frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it." —H. G. Wells, The New World Order
"And there's too many of us, and most of us are living incorrectly. If we had a much smaller population, and over time we could have an ethic where we had only one child, and over maybe 300 or 400 years we could cut back to 250 million – 350 million people." —Ted Turner, Interview
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself." —Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution: A report by the Council of the Club of Rome
"Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number. He then showed solutions for reducing the world’s population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets." —Forrest Mim's account of a speech by University of Texas evolutionary ecologist Eric Pianka
"An ABC website has been accused of portraying farmers and forestry workers as evil and telling kids how much carbon they can produce before they die." —"ABC website tells kids when they should die"
"To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society." —Paul Ehrlich et al., Ecoscience
"To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people." —Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Major Foreign Policy Challenges for the Next US President."
Just Kidding
So, did you catch the subtle message that the crafty cabal carefully coded into their public communiqués?
No? Oh, OK, you got me! There's no secret message. It's right there in the open.
For the completely clueless, the points that pop up again and again in the oligarchs' oratory are:
Humanity is the enemy.
We must reduce the population.
Billions of commoners must die that we and our progeny may live.
That's it. It's right there in black and white in their major publications, security memoranda, white papers and speeches. Heck, it's even engraved in stone . . . or at least it used to be until some enterprising individuals turned that stone into rubble. The point is: there is no secret message. There's only a completely out-in-the-open one.
And, once you truly understand this message and the ruthless, psychopathic, eugenicist, elitist, anti-human mindset of the kakistocrats who promulgate it, you can finally make sense of world events.
Why is the environmental movement stewarded over by murderous, human-hating wackos who desire to see billions of people die? Because the conservation movement (and all of the mainstream environmental organizations that grew out of that movement) was pioneered by murderous, human-hating eugenicists and funded by the eugenicist royals who wanted to keep their beautiful natural vistas clear of the riff-raff scurrying around beneath them.
Why do nation after nation appear to be in a race to the bottom, implementing policies that will actively hinder the productivity of their own populations and making it more and more difficult for those on the lowest rung of the economic ladder to eke out a subsistence living on the corporate-governmental fascist plantation that we call the developed world? And why is it now increasingly in vogue for governments to offer "medically assisted dying" as their "solution" to the strain and stress of this deliberately degraded world? Because those same governments are stewarded over by elitist eugenicists who hate you and want you dead, of course.
And why do The $cience™ (a registered trademark of the AstroPfizerDernica corporation, as we all know) and academia and the mainstream press and Hollywood and every other pusher of establishment propaganda mindlessly parrot anti-human narratives? Because they are funded and populated by the same elitist, eugenicist, human-hating depopulationists, naturally.
As I say, once you see the "super secret" message in the psychopaths' public statements for what it is, none of the actions they take are particularly difficult to figure out.
And yet, when you spell out this blindingly obvious reality to the masses, you get massive pushback. It seems they have so internalized the "humans are a cancer on the planet" meme that they've been duped into believing that this idea is their own original thought and that they are somehow brave and transgressive for articulating it.
Which leads to the question:
Why, Then, Do People Not See This Message?
There's a bit of advice that gets passed around online these days: "When someone shows you who they are, believe them."
Just type that phrase into your search engine of choice and you'll discover two things: firstly, the quote is commonly attributed to Maya Angelou; and secondly, it is oft-cited relationship advice that is posted in reddit fora and self-help blogs and other places where one is likely to encounter trite, pop culture truisms.
Like so many of those pop psy clichés, it appeals because it's seemingly simple but actually profound. As Maya Angelou explains, people will sometimes tell us that they're mean or they're crazy. Our first response in such cases is often one of reassurance: "Oh, you're not crazy," or "Oh, I don't think you're unkind!" Then, when the person turns out to actually be nasty or deranged, they can rightly protest that we have no right to be angry at them; after all, they told us what they are.
In a similar way, the globalists are not hiding their intentions behind some secret cypher. They're telling us openly that we are their enemy. That they want us to eat bugs. That they want us herded into 15-minute cities, where they plan to monitor, track and control us. And that their end goal is to get rid of billions of us.
Yet here, too, the average, non-psychopathic person's response to such admissions is one of reassurance. "That's not what they're really saying. They're just demonstrating that there's a problem. They're not talking about killing us. And even if they were, it's because they care for us!"
When the globalists proceed to do the very things they announced they were going to do, we can hardly act surprised, can we? After all, they did warn us!
Paraphrasing Angelou, then, perhaps we can come up with some apt "relationship advice" for those stuck in a Stockholm Syndrome bond with their elitist captors:
When genocidal, anti-human psychopaths tell you who they are, believe them!
So, What is Our Message?
You didn't think I would leave things there, did you? Of course not. The real point of parsing the globalists' (not-so-) secret message is that doing so helps us to clarify our own position.
When you boil it down, it’s actually pretty basic. The globalists hate life and want to end it. To counteract them, we must cherish life and seek to preserve it.
Allow me to quote myself at length from my 2016 editorial on "The Greatest Blessing":
We are programmed to look out for danger and respond to threats. It’s instinctual, and well it should be. We live in a dangerous world and our family line wouldn’t have made it this far if there weren’t an eternal vigilance against potential perils.
But always focusing on the threats and dangers can send us off the deep end. Especially when dealing in the doom and gloom that pervades so much of the alternative media, it can be all too easy to dwell on the negative and forget why it is we’re fighting for truth and justice in the first place. In fact, it can become difficult to remember that we’re fighting for anything at all and just focus on fighting against. Against our enemies. Against the politicians and banksters and globalists and fraudsters and psychopaths. But, just like the returning war vet who can’t stop fighting the war in his head or the homicide detective who assumes everyone is a murder victim in waiting (or a murderer in waiting), this perspective starts to ruin our appreciation of the world until we forget why it is we even cared in the first place.
Sadly, this isn’t some theoretical problem. I get dozens of emails a week from people who are frightened and angry and at their wits’ end, asking me how I manage to keep doing this work given all the evil that we are facing. The answer is so simple that I’m not sure it can be taught, only perceived. In short, the answer is that I love my life. I love my family and my friends and watching clouds roll by on a lazy summer afternoon and reading a good book and hearing the sound of my son’s laughter and, yes, hearing my daughter’s cry. The cry of a healthy, growing newborn. This is why I care. I care because life is worth living, and I see that deep down most people are the same; they just want to enjoy their families and their friends and their time on this planet, too. I’m not fighting against the powers that shouldn’t be. I’m fighting for all of those things in the world that are worth saving.
That's my not-so-secret message. What's yours?
URGENT: Ongoing "Bloodbath" at Planet Fitness!
The radical trans agenda is crumbling...
Patriot,
Last week, I released a shocking report exposing Planet Fitness — who are openly allowing men to enter and even SHAVE in the women’s bathroom facilities.
Of course, Planet Fitness went ahead and doubled down on their radical trans policy after being exposed. They clearly could not care less for the safety of their female members.
Big mistake, Planet Fitness.
A Planet Fitness Insider has even reached out and told me there is internal panic at the company and mass membership cancellations.
Now that is a real “BLOODBATH.”
As successful as this story was, our work doesn’t end here.
My life’s mission is to expose the lies that are harming children in schools, putting women at risk, and destroying America.
Somehow, the Corporate Media thinks that makes me evil.
We will expose Planet Fitness. We will protect REAL WOMEN. Period.
The truth is, I could not be doing this without you.
I know you care about the truth just like me. You know what’s at stake for our country in 2024 and beyond.
That’s why I am humbly asking for your support.
It is up to me and you to hold these powerful corporate oligarchs accountable.
Thank you for everything you do in our continued fight for truth and sanity.
Your support means more to me than I can ever express in words.
In Truth,
Chaya Raichik
Founder, Libs of TikTok
Do you store your issues in your tissues?
“If you are experiencing strange symptoms that no one seems to be able to explain, they could be arising from a traumatic reaction to a past event that you may not even remember.” These are the words of Peter Levine, a psychologist and pioneer in the field of the intricate connections between the body and mind in the aftermath of trauma.
A Solid Support System
Dr. Van der Kolk also stresses the importance of a good support network, which can be an antidote to trauma and a powerful protection mechanism. Patients tend to recover best in the context of relationships with others, such as therapists, religious communities, loved ones, families, and Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, as these provide emotional and physical safety, free from judgment or shame.
“Trauma cannot be ignored,” Mr. Levine wrote in “Waking the Tiger.” It is deeply rooted in people’s primal biology, which has allowed us to survive. The only path to liberation is renegotiating and transforming our traumatic experiences, he noted.
Marxist Education in your schools.
They are manufacturing gender dysphoria, or as better described in the excellent book When Kids Say They’re Trans, Gender Distress.
I am very interested in this subject.
I want to understand:
Who is doing it.
How they are doing it.
Why they are doing it.
What are the consequences of doing it.
The “it” is Queering.
We are living in The Queering age.
I caught up with an old friend the other day, and he didn’t know why people were putting their pronouns in their signatures and hadn’t heard the term “cisgender” yet. That is still unfortunately very normal.
To fight this thing, we need to wake up to its existence first.
To those new to my writings, I have written the following on the subject so far:
FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.” (substack.com)
ROGD - Lies are Unbekoming (substack.com)
Gender-Related Distress - Lies are Unbekoming (substack.com)
DeTransition - Lies are Unbekoming (substack.com)
I will write more.
I am currently reading The Queering of the American Child by Lancing and Lindsay. It is magnificent! I cannot recommend it highly enough.
The Politics of Parody
I used to be a sucker for Eurovision. I can see you rolling your eyes. Stop it, we all need our vices.
In 2014 a Woman™ with a beard won it. Conchita Wurst (born Thomas Neuwirth) from Austria.
I didn’t understand what I was watching or what was happening at the time.
Now I do, with thanks to Lancing and Lindsay.
This section from the book:
Put simply, Butler suggests we just happen to be born in a body that looks and works one way or the other. Sex, in this sense, is an allusion—it only becomes discernible through cultural interpretations of anatomical differences and does not mean anything prior to such interpretations."
Butler, like many infected by Critical Marxism and Postmodernism, is particularly pessimistic about this state. She does not believe that the socialization of "normal" society can be entirely broken, so she recommends a particular and passive-aggressive approach to Queer Activism: the politics of parody. What this means is that Butler's Queer Theory encourages using parodies of gender, sex, and sexual stereotypes as a wedge to undermine people's belief in them. Following from this are drag, the "camp" aesthetic, and even the leaning into gender stereotypes as definitional at the heart of trans presentation, either through strategic exaggeration or intentional gender-bending, like a bearded lady. The goal of this approach is to mock the meaning out of sex, gender, and sexuality entirely to undermine people's belief in them as meaningful and stable categories relevant to being. In the end, everyone becomes queer because no one can believe in "normal" anymore.
Queer Theory is an all-out assault on Normal.
Queer Theory is an all-out assault on Innocence.
The following four articles are the basis for the synthesis of the 30 Q&As to follow:
Queer Education is Child Abuse - New Discourses (substack.com)
Queer Theory is the Doctrine of a Sex-Based Cult (substack.com)
Marxism is a Cult Religion - New Discourses (substack.com)
Somewhere Over The Rainbow: Introducing The Queering of the American Child (substack.com)
30 Questions and Answers
1. What is Queer Theory according to David Halperin's definition in his 1995 book "Saint Foucault"?
According to David Halperin in "Saint Foucault," Queer Theory defines "queer" as an identity without an essence. Unlike gay identity which is rooted in the fact of homosexuality, queer identity is not grounded in any positive truth or stable reality.
Queer acquires meaning only from its oppositional relation to the norm - it is whatever is at odds with the normal, legitimate and dominant. There is nothing in particular that queer refers to.
2. How does the definition of "queer" in Queer Theory differ from gay identity?
In Queer Theory, "queer" is defined as a positionality against the norm rather than a gay identity based in the reality of same-sex attraction. Gay identity is rooted in the positive fact of homosexuality, while queer is an identity without an essence, acquiring meaning only from opposing norms.
Halperin clearly states that "queer" is unlike gay identity. Queer demarcates a positionality vis-à-vis the normative which is available to anyone marginalized for their sexual practices, not restricted only to lesbians and gay men.
3. What is the actual purpose of Drag Queen Story Hour according to the curriculum paper, beyond the "marketing" strategy of increasing LGBT empathy?
While Drag Queen Story Hour promotes itself as "family friendly" to increase LGBT empathy, the actual purpose, revealed in the curriculum paper, is to initiate children into "alternate modes of kinship."
The "family friendly" framing is strategically used for marketing, but the real meaning of "family" here is an "old-school queer code" referring to the "other queers" that DQSH connects children with. The aim is a "preparatory introduction" to queer alternative kinship, not simply LGBT acceptance.
4. How do Queer Activists use gay people and the gay rights movement to further their agenda, according to the text?
Queer Activists parasitically hide behind gay people and exploit the gay rights movement to advance their own agenda, while in fact often opposing the goals of gay equality and civil rights.
Queer Theory needs radical activists, not gays who seek to be normalized and equal in society, which Queer Theorists condemn as "homonormativity." By equating criticism of Queer Theory's grooming with past anti-gay stereotypes, Queer Activists cynically use gays as shields while harming their acceptance.
5. What is the goal of Queer Theory in education as explained by scholar Kevin Kumashiro?
According to Kevin Kumashiro, the goal of Queer Theory in education is to induce emotional and identity-based crises in students through repeated exposure to disruptive ideas.
Queer educators then guide the destabilized students to resolve their crises by adopting Queer Theory beliefs, leading them to "work through their crises productively" toward an anti-oppressive queer stance. Kumashiro openly states this manipulative practice is the responsibility of queer educators.
6. How does Queer Theory aim to disrupt the innocence of childhood according to researcher Hannah Dyer?
Hannah Dyer argues that childhood innocence is seen as harmful by Queer Theory and disrupting it is necessary for children's proper development into "queer" identities and understandings.
Dyer claims the "insistence on childhood innocence" stemming from traditional developmental psychology actually "injures" children and prevents the embrace of children's "queer curiosity and patterns of growth." Queer Theory seeks to rewrite childhood innocence as oppressive to children's queerness.
7. What techniques does Queer Theory use to initiate children into its beliefs, akin to cult indoctrination methods?
Queer Theory uses emotional manipulation techniques common to cults to indoctrinate children, such as inducing identity crises and trauma then offering affirmation if they adopt queer beliefs.
This "trauma bonding" destabilizes children, exploits their need for belonging, and isolates them in a totalizing queer milieu that normalizes alternate realities and queer kinship. Loading the language with jargon also induces reliance on queer gurus to navigate the new terrain.
8. How does the text characterize Queer Theory - is it a legitimate academic theory or something else?
The text argues that Queer Theory is not a legitimate academic theory but is in fact the doctrine of a religious sex cult that parasitically hides behind gay rights to target children for indoctrination.
Drawing on work by cult expert Robert Jay Lifton, the text walks through how Queer Theory exhibits multiple cultic traits, from "sacred science" to "mystical manipulation" to "dispensing of existence." Emotionally and intellectually, Queer Theory functions as a cult.
9. What are the main reasons Queer Theory targets children, according to the author?
The text argues there are four main reasons Queer Theory targets children:
Children in schools are a captive, vulnerable audience.
Children lack the cognitive development to distinguish Queer Theory's mystifications from reality.
Children are in the process of identity formation which Queer Theory seeks to highjack for its own ends.
Indoctrinated children become a wedge to queerify their families and other institutions. Children are the prime targets for Queer Theory's cultish conversion.
10. How does Queer Theory relate to Marxism and other forms of Marxist-derived "theories"?
Queer Theory follows the same underlying framework as Marxism and other Marxist-derived "theories" like Critical Race Theory. They are all "theosophical cults" following a gnostic myth of liberating mankind from false consciousness.
The oppressor vs. oppressed dichotomy, the denial of objective reality, and the goal of raising consciousness to embrace the doctrine's view of "true nature" are all shared between Queer Theory and Marxism. Queer Theory is simply one manifestation of the Marxist meta-cult.
11. What is the underlying myth or belief system behind theosophical cults and how does Marxism/Queer Theory follow this pattern?
Theosophical cults believe mankind has fallen from unity into a false world of separation and individuality ruled by an evil Demiurge. Only the cult possesses the secret gnosis to liberate mankind back into oneness.
Marxism and Queer Theory map the theosophical framework onto modern ideologies. The bourgeoisie or straight/cis people are the Demiurge, private property or gender norms are the false reality, and revolution guided by the cult doctrine will return man to a communist or queer utopia.
12. How do accusations of "anti-LGBTQ hate" work to pressure and bully critics of Queer Theory into silence or acquiescence?
Accusations of "anti-LGBTQ hate" exploit past negative stereotypes of gays/lesbians as predatory to silence criticism of Queer Theory's actual predatory grooming. The goal is to bully critics into acquiescence via social pressure.
These accusations engage in motte-and-bailey argumentation - when criticized, Queer Theorists retreat to the motte of "opposing anti-gay prejudice" but in practice occupy the bailey of grooming kids via queer doctrine. This manipulative tactic chills opposition.
13. What is the ultimate goal of Marxism and Queer Theory in terms of the "spiritual evolution" of humankind?
The ultimate goal of Marxism and Queer Theory is to seize power in order to direct the "socio-spiritual evolution" of humanity into a utopian oneness, erasing individuality and norms to create a "New Man."
This "socio-spiritual" revolution aims to destroy existing society and religion in order to "return" mankind to its "true nature" of queer communist collectivism. It is an essentially religious vision guiding a totalitarian project of transforming human nature itself.
14. How does Queer Theory function as a totalizing environment or milieu that shapes the thoughts of those under its influence?
Queer Theory creates a cultic milieu that aims for total control over information, language and relationships to shape individuals' thoughts and identities. This environment normalizes the tenets of Queer Theory and cuts people off from outside views and relationships.
Immersive queer media, jargon, social pressure, and emotional manipulation all work together to craft a totalizing "sacred canopy" of queer dogma. Within this intellectual and social bubble, Queer Theory's liturgical repetition can reprogram individuals unimpeded.
15. What are the eight qualities of the cultic milieu as defined by Robert Jay Lifton and how does Queer Theory exhibit them?
Robert Jay Lifton identified eight qualities of the cultic milieu used for thought reform which Queer Theory exhibits:
Milieu control - control of information and communication.
Mystical manipulation - staging events to appear spontaneous.
Demand for purity - simplistic black-white morality.
Cult of confession - sin and confession used to break down identity.
"Sacred science" - dogma is the ultimate moral vision for humanity.
Loading the language - controlling language helps control thought.
Doctrine over person - individual identity must be reshaped to conform.
Dispensing of existence - those outside the group have no right to exist. Through these cultic dynamics of control, Queer Theory can thoroughly reform individuals.
16. What role does the concept of childhood innocence play in Queer Theory and how does the ideology seek to disrupt it?
Queer Theory views childhood innocence and the developmental psychology behind it as an oppressive product of a cis-heteronormative society that "injures" children by preventing them from embracing their "queer curiosity."
Following thinkers like Foucault who wanted to liberate child sexuality, Queer Theory seeks to disrupt the idea of childhood innocence through tactics like Drag Queen Story Hour. The goal is to initiate children into "queer consciousness" as early as possible.
17. How does the text describe the different levels of initiation and commitment within the "Queer Cult"?
The text describes three main levels of the Queer Cult:
The "outer school" of emotionally/socially bonded members not yet versed in queer doctrine.
The "inner school" of members emotionally and intellectually committed to Queer Theory.
The "inner circle" of cult leaders with financial/ideological motives.
As commitment increases, members are drawn deeper into the intellectual doctrine of Queer Theory beyond the "fun" social trappings experienced by new converts. Each level plays a role in the overall system of control and growth.
18. What are the key inspirations and progenitors of Queer Theory according to the text, such as Judith Butler and Michel Foucault?
Key progenitors of Queer Theory cited in the text include Judith Butler and her theory of gender as a performative "doing" without essential reality, and Michel Foucault who wanted to deconstruct sexual/gender categories to liberate "queer" sexualities.
Other influences mentioned are Alfred Kinsey and John Money who laid the pseudoscientific groundwork for separating sex from "gender," and Marxist roots in thinkers like Hegel. These form the intellectual foundation for Queer Theory's cult doctrine.
19. How does Queer Theory relate to earlier gender critical feminists like Simone de Beauvoir and her famous question "what is a woman?"
Queer Theory draws on earlier "gender critical" feminists like Simone de Beauvoir who in her 1949 book The Second Sex famously asked "what is a woman?"
Like later Queer Theorists, Beauvoir wanted to deconstruct womanhood and female identity, arguing it was an artificial product of patriarchal society rather than an inherent essence. This skepticism of gender as a "social construct" paved the way for Queer Theory.
20. What is the significance of Queer Theory positioning itself in opposition to anything considered normal, legitimate or dominant in society?
Positioning itself as oppositional to everything normal/legitimate/dominant in society is a key part of Queer Theory as a "theosophical cult." It frames itself as possessing secret wisdom to liberate people from the "Matrix" of cisheteropatriarchy.
By claiming to oppose all norms and structures as "socially constructed" illusions, Queer Theory sets itself up as a gnostic doctrine to free mankind. This turns reality itself into the "enemy" that must be rejected in favor of queer "truth."
21. How does the "demand for purity" play out in the Queer Theory cult milieu as described by Lifton?
Lifton's criteria of a cult's "demand for purity" plays out in Queer Theory through a simplistic black-and-white morality where everything is either "queer" (good) or "oppressive"/"hateful" (bad).
The doctrine becomes the all-encompassing judge of purity. Failure to conform is met with accusations of moral failure and demands for confession/struggle sessions. This dynamic erodes individual conscience and increases dependence on the cult doctrine.
22. What role does language play in Queer Theory and how does the ideology "load the language" as a cult tactic?
Language is a key tool for thought control in Queer Theory, as it is in all cults. Queer Theory is infamous for its rapid invention of new jargon terms and redefinition of existing language.
This "loading of the language" with queer meanings disorients people, drives a wedge between them and "unenlightened" friends/family, and increases reliance on queer gurus for guidance. Whoever controls the language wields significant power over minds.
23. How does the idea of "drag" relate to Queer Theory's conception of gender and identity as merely performance?
The centrality of "drag" in Queer Theory, exemplified by Drag Queen Story Hour, relates to queer dogma that gender is a "performance" - a costume to put on and take off - not an innate reality.
Judith Butler argues all gender is an "imitation for which there is no original" - a copy of a copy. If even biological sex is just a "performance," then drag is the true nature of all identity. "Life is drag" in Queer Theory.
24. What are some of the manipulative emotional dynamics the Queer Cult uses to draw in and indoctrinate victims?
The Queer Cult uses manipulative emotional dynamics like "love bombing" new recruits with attention/affirmation, then slowly isolating them and making their belonging contingent on adherence to queer dogma and cutting ties with "oppressive" loved ones.
This cycle of seduction, isolation, and indoctrination binds converts to the cult emotionally and socially. Guilt, shame and fear are used to draw people deeper into the queer milieu and away from "sinful" relationships holding them back from full queer actualization.
25. Why is it difficult to rely on captured institutions to push back against Queer Theory's influence?
Pushing back against Queer Theory is difficult because it has captured the commanding heights of education, media, medicine, psychology, government, and even some religions. These institutions now promote and enforce Queer Theory.
With the regime on their side, Queer theorists can easily outmaneuver opponents by controlling the narrative, funding, policies, and consequences for defection. Institutional capture allows minority ideologues to punch above their weight in the culture war.
26. What basic truths does the author argue need to be reasserted to combat Queer Theory's distortions?
To combat Queer Theory's linguistic distortions, the author argues for a return to basic truths: There are two sexes. Most people are straight. Homosexuality exists but "queer" is a political ideology, not an identity. Made-up genders aren't valid.
Refusing to play along with queer language games and insisting on bedrock biological and statistical realities is an important way to push back against queer linguistic dominance. Objective truths are a powerful weapon against postmodern relativism.
27. Why is it important to not just speak truth, but to love truth, when resisting Queer Theory's pressures?
The author argues it's not enough to merely speak truth - one must love truth with all one's being, and love one's neighbor enough to tell them the truth even when difficult. Courage of conviction is needed to resist queer pressure tactics.
Loving truth strengthens resolve and prevents capitulation in the face of sophisticated emotional/social manipulation. Being willing to be hated for telling the truth is a necessary component of effective resistance to the Queer Cult's demand for conformity.
28. How does speaking plain truths help break the cultic milieu and spell of Queer Theory?
Speaking plain, objective truths throws a wrench in the Queer Cult's "milieu control," "mystical manipulation," and "sacred science." It disrupts the hermetically sealed echo chamber and jolts people back to reality.
When people speak unvarnished common sense, like "a man can never be a woman" or "children are innocent and shouldn't be exposed to drag shows," it helps break the queer spell and exposes the dogma's absurdities. Truth has a power all its own.
29. What are the main theses the author puts forward about the nature of Queer Theory?
The author's central theses about Queer Theory are:
It is the doctrine of a religious sex cult, not a legitimate academic theory.
It parasitically hides behind gay rights while attacking gay progress.
It specifically targets children for predatory grooming and indoctrination.
It follows cult dynamics and Marxist social "science" to remake humanity.
In summary, Queer Theory is a subversive ideological virus, a memetic disease masquerading as education and civil rights, that abuses the young to create a utopian "New Man" - a queer, genderless, amoral posthumanist.
30. What book does the author recommend for further understanding this issue and joining the battle against Queer Theory's cultish influence?
For those who wish to understand the issue better and get involved in opposing Queer Theory's advance, the author recommends his book "The Queering of the American Child," co-authored with Logan Lancing.
The book exposes Queer Theory's alarming invasion of education and society using the ideology's own words, and aims to equip parents and citizens with the knowledge to fight back against the queering of children. It is a battle manual for the resistance.