Doctors, Scientists and Nurses against Vaccines and Passports.
If you don't look, you can't see. If you can't see you're the blind leading the blind. Don't be the blind leading the blind.
You don’t have to look far, if you ARE actually looking to see very credentialed and very respected scientists, doctors and nurses against vaccines and against vaccine passports that will invariably create a two-tiered unlawful society, which is exactly where we are headed if you continue to swallow the half truth’s and mostly lies the talking heads on your mainstream tell-a-vision are feeding you.
You are not hearing about the very real science behind Ivermectin
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 64 studies
Or Controversy within the Nurses profession (click)
and
Or how about the Great Barrington Declaration?
With 860,000 signatures including 14,981 Medical & Public Health Scientists and 44,167 medical professionals, including:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
Where top scientists at top Universities are warning about all the measures slowly being sneaked into place to create a surveillance society whereby if you don’t acquiesce to medical procedures without informed consent you cannot participate in a “vaccinated economy” as Premiere of the state of Victoria (Australia) recently called it:
Or how about the monoclonal antibody treatments that most patients are being denied in hospitals.
“To think that we've invented a therapy here and having taken the steps to bring it to patients is a failure of the system and one I think that needs to be corrected, as soon as possible,” Hansen said.
To have a Canadian company get federal funding to develop the drug, see the drug approved, but then have it “sitting in the freezer -- that’s a mystery,” Sidhu said. “Canada is dropping the ball.”
“My fever was up to about 103, 103 and a half and … I was feeling horrible. So, my wife called an ambulance, and the ambulance took me right off to the hospital,” Tavel explained.
At the hospital, Tavel asked to be treated with Bamlanivimab. But doctors said they couldn't administer it.
Tavel said the doctor told him that they “don’t have a protocol” for the drug. Instead, he was discharged and told to take Tylenol to help get his fever down.
Tavel’s daughter, Robyn, who lives in Glencoe, Illinois, says the family heard about using monoclonal antibodies to help treat COVID-19 through their local news after then-U.S. President Donald Trump was given an antibody cocktail for the virus.
“As soon as we knew that that was available in Canada… We immediately knew that my father had to have it,” Robyn said. “The window of opportunity to administer this was just 10 days after someone had become very sick, and had been diagnosed, and so we had to get action.”
Dr. Michael Silverman, chief of infectious diseases at Western University in London, Ont. and one of the authors of the letter, told CTV News that he’s been frustrated with how difficult it has been to access the medication.
“We have a crisis in hospitals and we should really be using all the tools at our disposal to make sure we don't end up in a situation where our hospitals are overwhelmed,” he said.
“We have a therapy here in Canada, it's one that has already been paid for, and it's sitting on the shelves. Meanwhile, people continue to get sick, and we should take every step that we can to make sure we are getting life saving therapies to patients as soon as possible,” Hansen said.
It may be worth having a lawyer draft up a legal letter presented to doctors upon arrival at the hospital that it is their duty to treat you with known, provable medications that CAN save your life.
Think about that? Think about it hard. Patients are dying because they’re being denied a treatment that works nearly 100% of the time to keep patients out of hospital where invasive measures like intubation with a ventilator are killing more than saving.
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell is an internal medicine provider established in New York, New York and his medical specialization is internal medicine (critical care medicine) with more than 12 years of experience.
he says,
“We are treating the wrong disease and we must change what we are doing if we want to save as many lives as possible… I fear that if we are using a false paradigm to treat a new disease, that the method by which we program the ventilator, one based on a notion of respiratory failure as opposed to oxygen failure, that this method, and there are a great number of methods we can use with the ventilators, but this method being widely adopted at this very moment in every hospital in the country which aims to increase pressure on the lungs in order to open them up is actually doing more harm than good. The ARDS that we are seeing, that the whole world is seeing, may be nothing more than lung injury caused by the ventilator.”
Doctors like Kyle-Sidell (who TIME could not reach for comment) argue these numbers are so high because physicians are ventilating patients as though they have a condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), when they in fact have a different type of lung damage that may not respond well to mechanical ventilation. A group of European physicians submitted a letter to the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, published March 30, detailing COVID-19’s discrepancies from typical ARDS and calling on doctors to avoid jumping to unnecessary mechanical ventilation. Other physicians say mechanical ventilation can help some patients, but doctors are jumping to it too quickly, potentially subjecting patients to unnecessary traumatic treatment when they could use less-invasive respiratory supports like breathing masks and nasal tubes.
So why are we using these invasive measures if we have proven therapeutics and if respirators can work just as well in many cases?
Why are those who have overcome this disease and a great body of evidence shows have more robust immunity being forced to take an injection, an injection that typically makes those who have recovered react badly?
How about Michael Yeadon?
Dr. Michael Yeadon — One of Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist in one of their divisions; for Allergy & Respiratory, spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field.
This “study” confirms exactly what Dr. Yeadon is claiming — that there will be perhaps a two year lapse between the time of the vaccination and when major fatal conditions — such as Prion Disease — start showing up in millions of those vaccinated, creating “plausible deniability” for the vaccines.
Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics, a group co-founded by former Pfizer vice president Michael Yeadon, counts more than 160 medical experts from around the world among its signatories. Other founding members include Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD, former chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of the health committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
The group cited a Chinese study of nearly 10 million people, which found that asymptomatic COVID carriers virtually never transmit the virus. “In contrast, the papers cited by the Centre for Disease Control to justify claims of asymptomatic transmission are based on hypothetical models, not empirical studies,” they said. “Plainly stated, vaccines are not necessary to prevent severe disease.
“The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear, the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous.” “[U]rging vaccination to ‘protect others’ therefore has no basis in fact,” their letter concluded, offering a sobering warning to those pushing the shots.
Dr. Robert Malone raises more concerns. Dr. Malone was lead scientist on the team that developed mRNA technology:
Robert W. Malone, M.D., M.S. Dr. Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines, while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. His research was continued at Vical in 1989, where the first in-vivo mammalian experiments were designed by him.
Rumble — Mirror - see below. Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.
Dr. Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist.
Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatment and the COVID vaccines.
Finally one of the other most oustpoken critics of the measures we are seeing today
Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, sends open call to all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entire world population.
Future Predictions and Solutions for COVID-19 Pendemic with Geert Vanden Bossche
“In summary, the concerns center around the notion that a combination of lockdowns and extreme selection pressure on the virus induced by the intense global mass vaccination program might diminish the number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the short-term, but ultimately, will induce the creation of more mutants of concern.
This is the result of what Vanden Bossche calls ‘immune escape’ (i.e. incomplete sterilization of the virus by the human immune system, even following vaccine administration). This will in turn trigger vaccine companies to further refine vaccines that will add, not reduce, the selection pressure, so producing ever more transmissible and potentially deadly variants.”
Read his open letter to the World Health Organization
In other words, the use of available therapeutics that WORK, along with protecting the most vulnerable always was, and IS, the fastest and safest way out of this. Instead, proven therapeutics are sitting on the shelves, or discredited with bad science and bad actors in favor of invasive measures, or NONE at all (“go home and come back when you’re worse”), while we wait for a vaccine that does NOT immunize, only “protects” in the short term while possibly contributing the antibody dependent escape (ADE) or escape from the jab into further mutations which will require perpetual jabs to control until that small snowball has morphed into a giant avalanche that nothing can stop?
The mainstream media has smeared these three, life long vaccine researchers as ANTI-VAX, and people fall for it. It’s astonishing, really. Especially by hoax producers Snopes, a couple who take mainstream narratives and then use mainstream sources to “debunk” anything not “mainstream”. Funny how that works.
Where is the honest debate in the main stream media. This other side of the scientific debate is not being presented.
Why?
Trust only the science we tell you.
Remember, only “politicians” can be bought and paid for.
References:
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/310963
http://news.emory.edu/stories/2021/07/covid_survivors_resistance/index.html
https://www.webmd.com/coronavirus-in-context/video/coronavirus-in-context-cameron-kyle-sidell
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/08/doctors-say-ventilators-overused-for-covid-19/
https://rumble.com/vm75gl-australian-premier-dan-andrews-we-are-going-to-lock-out-the-unvaccinated.html
https://gbdeclaration.org/
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/canadian-made-covid-19-antibody-treatment-sitting-on-shelves-due-to-lack-of-administration-plan-1.5396804
https://ivmmeta.com/
https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/api/v4/streams/free/vostfr-dernier-avertissement-dr.michael-yeadon/c18ee90f9685e6391fd17afdb1a3caf462b7b516/0c2bfe
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/about-us
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rob-verkerk-geert-vanden-bossche-global-mass-covid-vaccination-lethal-variants-speaking-naturally/
https://37b32f5a-6ed9-4d6d-b3e1-5ec648ad9ed9.filesusr.com/ugd/28d8fe_266039aeb27a4465988c37adec9cd1dc.pdf - Open Letter to Who.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kj2QVFsWl67I/ - Geert Vanden Bossche
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/